Review




Structured Review

Ricca Chemical Company simulated intestinal fluid (sif)
Simulated Intestinal Fluid (Sif), supplied by Ricca Chemical Company, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fluid+sif/pm39674455-49-7-12?v=Ricca+Chemical+Company
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
simulated intestinal fluid (sif) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars

Images



Similar Products

86
Shanghai Yuanye Biotechnology fluid sif
Fluid Sif, supplied by Shanghai Yuanye Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fluid+sif/pm42270234-35-7-12?v=Shanghai+Yuanye+Biotechnology
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fluid sif - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Shanghai Yuanye Biochemicals fluid sif
Preparation of nanoCEL and its immune‐modulation properties in vitro. (A) Schematic fabrication of nanoCEL; (B) Effect of drug/polymer feed ratio on the mean particle size and polydispersity index (PDI) of nanoCEL; (C) The optical (inset) and TEM images of nanoCEL; (D) Particle size distribution, zeta potential, loading capacity (LC), and encapsulation efficiency (EE) of nanoCEL; (E) In vitro release profiles of nanoCEL under varied pH conditions (PBS, pH = 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5) at 37°C for 120 h (n = 3; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. pH = 1.5); (F) In vitro stability of nanoCEL in simulated gastric fluid (SGF) at 37°C for 2 h, followed by <t>simulated</t> <t>intestinal</t> <t>fluid</t> <t>(SIF)</t> at 37°C for 6 h (n = 3); (G) CLMS images and flow cytometry analysis of JAWSII dendritic cell uptake of various formulations after incubation for 15 min. Nile Red (NR) fluorescence is depicted in red. (n = 6; ns indicates no significance, *** p < 0.001 vs. blank group); (H) IL‐6, IL‐12p70, and CXCL5 levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated JAWSII dendritic cells after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (I) NO, IL‐6, and TNF‐α levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (J) Western blot analysis of CD206 and Arg‐1 levels from each group (n = 3; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001).
Fluid Sif, supplied by Shanghai Yuanye Biochemicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fluid+sif/pmc13067824-37-7-12?v=Shanghai+Yuanye+Biochemicals
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fluid sif - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Merck & Co simulatory intestinal fluid sif
Preparation of nanoCEL and its immune‐modulation properties in vitro. (A) Schematic fabrication of nanoCEL; (B) Effect of drug/polymer feed ratio on the mean particle size and polydispersity index (PDI) of nanoCEL; (C) The optical (inset) and TEM images of nanoCEL; (D) Particle size distribution, zeta potential, loading capacity (LC), and encapsulation efficiency (EE) of nanoCEL; (E) In vitro release profiles of nanoCEL under varied pH conditions (PBS, pH = 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5) at 37°C for 120 h (n = 3; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. pH = 1.5); (F) In vitro stability of nanoCEL in simulated gastric fluid (SGF) at 37°C for 2 h, followed by <t>simulated</t> <t>intestinal</t> <t>fluid</t> <t>(SIF)</t> at 37°C for 6 h (n = 3); (G) CLMS images and flow cytometry analysis of JAWSII dendritic cell uptake of various formulations after incubation for 15 min. Nile Red (NR) fluorescence is depicted in red. (n = 6; ns indicates no significance, *** p < 0.001 vs. blank group); (H) IL‐6, IL‐12p70, and CXCL5 levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated JAWSII dendritic cells after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (I) NO, IL‐6, and TNF‐α levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (J) Western blot analysis of CD206 and Arg‐1 levels from each group (n = 3; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001).
Simulatory Intestinal Fluid Sif, supplied by Merck & Co, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fluid+sif/pmc12788162-52-0-7?v=Merck+%26+Co
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
simulatory intestinal fluid sif - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Shanghai Macklin Biochemical simulated intestinal fluid sif
Preparation of nanoCEL and its immune‐modulation properties in vitro. (A) Schematic fabrication of nanoCEL; (B) Effect of drug/polymer feed ratio on the mean particle size and polydispersity index (PDI) of nanoCEL; (C) The optical (inset) and TEM images of nanoCEL; (D) Particle size distribution, zeta potential, loading capacity (LC), and encapsulation efficiency (EE) of nanoCEL; (E) In vitro release profiles of nanoCEL under varied pH conditions (PBS, pH = 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5) at 37°C for 120 h (n = 3; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. pH = 1.5); (F) In vitro stability of nanoCEL in simulated gastric fluid (SGF) at 37°C for 2 h, followed by <t>simulated</t> <t>intestinal</t> <t>fluid</t> <t>(SIF)</t> at 37°C for 6 h (n = 3); (G) CLMS images and flow cytometry analysis of JAWSII dendritic cell uptake of various formulations after incubation for 15 min. Nile Red (NR) fluorescence is depicted in red. (n = 6; ns indicates no significance, *** p < 0.001 vs. blank group); (H) IL‐6, IL‐12p70, and CXCL5 levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated JAWSII dendritic cells after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (I) NO, IL‐6, and TNF‐α levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (J) Western blot analysis of CD206 and Arg‐1 levels from each group (n = 3; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001).
Simulated Intestinal Fluid Sif, supplied by Shanghai Macklin Biochemical, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fluid+sif/pmc12385531-48-0-7?v=Shanghai+Macklin+Biochemical
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
simulated intestinal fluid sif - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Shanghai Yuanye Biochemicals simulated small intestinal fluid (sif)
Preparation of nanoCEL and its immune‐modulation properties in vitro. (A) Schematic fabrication of nanoCEL; (B) Effect of drug/polymer feed ratio on the mean particle size and polydispersity index (PDI) of nanoCEL; (C) The optical (inset) and TEM images of nanoCEL; (D) Particle size distribution, zeta potential, loading capacity (LC), and encapsulation efficiency (EE) of nanoCEL; (E) In vitro release profiles of nanoCEL under varied pH conditions (PBS, pH = 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5) at 37°C for 120 h (n = 3; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. pH = 1.5); (F) In vitro stability of nanoCEL in simulated gastric fluid (SGF) at 37°C for 2 h, followed by <t>simulated</t> <t>intestinal</t> <t>fluid</t> <t>(SIF)</t> at 37°C for 6 h (n = 3); (G) CLMS images and flow cytometry analysis of JAWSII dendritic cell uptake of various formulations after incubation for 15 min. Nile Red (NR) fluorescence is depicted in red. (n = 6; ns indicates no significance, *** p < 0.001 vs. blank group); (H) IL‐6, IL‐12p70, and CXCL5 levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated JAWSII dendritic cells after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (I) NO, IL‐6, and TNF‐α levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (J) Western blot analysis of CD206 and Arg‐1 levels from each group (n = 3; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001).
Simulated Small Intestinal Fluid (Sif), supplied by Shanghai Yuanye Biochemicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fluid+sif/pm40253176-45-6-21?v=Shanghai+Yuanye+Biochemicals
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
simulated small intestinal fluid (sif) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Dojindo Labs simulated intestinal fluid (sif)
Preparation of nanoCEL and its immune‐modulation properties in vitro. (A) Schematic fabrication of nanoCEL; (B) Effect of drug/polymer feed ratio on the mean particle size and polydispersity index (PDI) of nanoCEL; (C) The optical (inset) and TEM images of nanoCEL; (D) Particle size distribution, zeta potential, loading capacity (LC), and encapsulation efficiency (EE) of nanoCEL; (E) In vitro release profiles of nanoCEL under varied pH conditions (PBS, pH = 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5) at 37°C for 120 h (n = 3; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. pH = 1.5); (F) In vitro stability of nanoCEL in simulated gastric fluid (SGF) at 37°C for 2 h, followed by <t>simulated</t> <t>intestinal</t> <t>fluid</t> <t>(SIF)</t> at 37°C for 6 h (n = 3); (G) CLMS images and flow cytometry analysis of JAWSII dendritic cell uptake of various formulations after incubation for 15 min. Nile Red (NR) fluorescence is depicted in red. (n = 6; ns indicates no significance, *** p < 0.001 vs. blank group); (H) IL‐6, IL‐12p70, and CXCL5 levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated JAWSII dendritic cells after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (I) NO, IL‐6, and TNF‐α levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (J) Western blot analysis of CD206 and Arg‐1 levels from each group (n = 3; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001).
Simulated Intestinal Fluid (Sif), supplied by Dojindo Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fluid+sif/10__1016_slash_j__jddst__2025__106914-69-0-18?v=Dojindo+Labs
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
simulated intestinal fluid (sif) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Shanghai Yuanye Biotechnology simulated intestinal fluid (sif)
Preparation of nanoCEL and its immune‐modulation properties in vitro. (A) Schematic fabrication of nanoCEL; (B) Effect of drug/polymer feed ratio on the mean particle size and polydispersity index (PDI) of nanoCEL; (C) The optical (inset) and TEM images of nanoCEL; (D) Particle size distribution, zeta potential, loading capacity (LC), and encapsulation efficiency (EE) of nanoCEL; (E) In vitro release profiles of nanoCEL under varied pH conditions (PBS, pH = 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5) at 37°C for 120 h (n = 3; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. pH = 1.5); (F) In vitro stability of nanoCEL in simulated gastric fluid (SGF) at 37°C for 2 h, followed by <t>simulated</t> <t>intestinal</t> <t>fluid</t> <t>(SIF)</t> at 37°C for 6 h (n = 3); (G) CLMS images and flow cytometry analysis of JAWSII dendritic cell uptake of various formulations after incubation for 15 min. Nile Red (NR) fluorescence is depicted in red. (n = 6; ns indicates no significance, *** p < 0.001 vs. blank group); (H) IL‐6, IL‐12p70, and CXCL5 levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated JAWSII dendritic cells after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (I) NO, IL‐6, and TNF‐α levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (J) Western blot analysis of CD206 and Arg‐1 levels from each group (n = 3; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001).
Simulated Intestinal Fluid (Sif), supplied by Shanghai Yuanye Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fluid+sif/pm40132702-39-21-26?v=Shanghai+Yuanye+Biotechnology
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
simulated intestinal fluid (sif) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Ricca Chemical Company simulated intestinal fluid (sif)
Preparation of nanoCEL and its immune‐modulation properties in vitro. (A) Schematic fabrication of nanoCEL; (B) Effect of drug/polymer feed ratio on the mean particle size and polydispersity index (PDI) of nanoCEL; (C) The optical (inset) and TEM images of nanoCEL; (D) Particle size distribution, zeta potential, loading capacity (LC), and encapsulation efficiency (EE) of nanoCEL; (E) In vitro release profiles of nanoCEL under varied pH conditions (PBS, pH = 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5) at 37°C for 120 h (n = 3; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. pH = 1.5); (F) In vitro stability of nanoCEL in simulated gastric fluid (SGF) at 37°C for 2 h, followed by <t>simulated</t> <t>intestinal</t> <t>fluid</t> <t>(SIF)</t> at 37°C for 6 h (n = 3); (G) CLMS images and flow cytometry analysis of JAWSII dendritic cell uptake of various formulations after incubation for 15 min. Nile Red (NR) fluorescence is depicted in red. (n = 6; ns indicates no significance, *** p < 0.001 vs. blank group); (H) IL‐6, IL‐12p70, and CXCL5 levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated JAWSII dendritic cells after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (I) NO, IL‐6, and TNF‐α levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (J) Western blot analysis of CD206 and Arg‐1 levels from each group (n = 3; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001).
Simulated Intestinal Fluid (Sif), supplied by Ricca Chemical Company, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fluid+sif/pm39674455-49-7-12?v=Ricca+Chemical+Company
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
simulated intestinal fluid (sif) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Shanghai Yuanye Biotechnology simulated intestinal fluid (sif
Preparation of nanoCEL and its immune‐modulation properties in vitro. (A) Schematic fabrication of nanoCEL; (B) Effect of drug/polymer feed ratio on the mean particle size and polydispersity index (PDI) of nanoCEL; (C) The optical (inset) and TEM images of nanoCEL; (D) Particle size distribution, zeta potential, loading capacity (LC), and encapsulation efficiency (EE) of nanoCEL; (E) In vitro release profiles of nanoCEL under varied pH conditions (PBS, pH = 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5) at 37°C for 120 h (n = 3; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. pH = 1.5); (F) In vitro stability of nanoCEL in simulated gastric fluid (SGF) at 37°C for 2 h, followed by <t>simulated</t> <t>intestinal</t> <t>fluid</t> <t>(SIF)</t> at 37°C for 6 h (n = 3); (G) CLMS images and flow cytometry analysis of JAWSII dendritic cell uptake of various formulations after incubation for 15 min. Nile Red (NR) fluorescence is depicted in red. (n = 6; ns indicates no significance, *** p < 0.001 vs. blank group); (H) IL‐6, IL‐12p70, and CXCL5 levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated JAWSII dendritic cells after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (I) NO, IL‐6, and TNF‐α levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (J) Western blot analysis of CD206 and Arg‐1 levels from each group (n = 3; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001).
Simulated Intestinal Fluid (Sif, supplied by Shanghai Yuanye Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fluid+sif/pmc11795786-35-11-16?v=Shanghai+Yuanye+Biotechnology
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
simulated intestinal fluid (sif - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Shanghai Yuanye Biochemicals simulated intestinal fluid (sif
Preparation of nanoCEL and its immune‐modulation properties in vitro. (A) Schematic fabrication of nanoCEL; (B) Effect of drug/polymer feed ratio on the mean particle size and polydispersity index (PDI) of nanoCEL; (C) The optical (inset) and TEM images of nanoCEL; (D) Particle size distribution, zeta potential, loading capacity (LC), and encapsulation efficiency (EE) of nanoCEL; (E) In vitro release profiles of nanoCEL under varied pH conditions (PBS, pH = 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5) at 37°C for 120 h (n = 3; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. pH = 1.5); (F) In vitro stability of nanoCEL in simulated gastric fluid (SGF) at 37°C for 2 h, followed by <t>simulated</t> <t>intestinal</t> <t>fluid</t> <t>(SIF)</t> at 37°C for 6 h (n = 3); (G) CLMS images and flow cytometry analysis of JAWSII dendritic cell uptake of various formulations after incubation for 15 min. Nile Red (NR) fluorescence is depicted in red. (n = 6; ns indicates no significance, *** p < 0.001 vs. blank group); (H) IL‐6, IL‐12p70, and CXCL5 levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated JAWSII dendritic cells after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (I) NO, IL‐6, and TNF‐α levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (J) Western blot analysis of CD206 and Arg‐1 levels from each group (n = 3; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001).
Simulated Intestinal Fluid (Sif, supplied by Shanghai Yuanye Biochemicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fluid+sif/pm39629540-247-38-43?v=Shanghai+Yuanye+Biochemicals
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
simulated intestinal fluid (sif - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Preparation of nanoCEL and its immune‐modulation properties in vitro. (A) Schematic fabrication of nanoCEL; (B) Effect of drug/polymer feed ratio on the mean particle size and polydispersity index (PDI) of nanoCEL; (C) The optical (inset) and TEM images of nanoCEL; (D) Particle size distribution, zeta potential, loading capacity (LC), and encapsulation efficiency (EE) of nanoCEL; (E) In vitro release profiles of nanoCEL under varied pH conditions (PBS, pH = 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5) at 37°C for 120 h (n = 3; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. pH = 1.5); (F) In vitro stability of nanoCEL in simulated gastric fluid (SGF) at 37°C for 2 h, followed by simulated intestinal fluid (SIF) at 37°C for 6 h (n = 3); (G) CLMS images and flow cytometry analysis of JAWSII dendritic cell uptake of various formulations after incubation for 15 min. Nile Red (NR) fluorescence is depicted in red. (n = 6; ns indicates no significance, *** p < 0.001 vs. blank group); (H) IL‐6, IL‐12p70, and CXCL5 levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated JAWSII dendritic cells after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (I) NO, IL‐6, and TNF‐α levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (J) Western blot analysis of CD206 and Arg‐1 levels from each group (n = 3; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001).

Journal: Advanced Science

Article Title: Oral Celastrol Nanomedicine Targeting Intestinal Antigen‐Presenting Cells to Effectively Mitigate Autoimmune Uveitis via Gut‐Retina Axis

doi: 10.1002/advs.202519503

Figure Lengend Snippet: Preparation of nanoCEL and its immune‐modulation properties in vitro. (A) Schematic fabrication of nanoCEL; (B) Effect of drug/polymer feed ratio on the mean particle size and polydispersity index (PDI) of nanoCEL; (C) The optical (inset) and TEM images of nanoCEL; (D) Particle size distribution, zeta potential, loading capacity (LC), and encapsulation efficiency (EE) of nanoCEL; (E) In vitro release profiles of nanoCEL under varied pH conditions (PBS, pH = 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5) at 37°C for 120 h (n = 3; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. pH = 1.5); (F) In vitro stability of nanoCEL in simulated gastric fluid (SGF) at 37°C for 2 h, followed by simulated intestinal fluid (SIF) at 37°C for 6 h (n = 3); (G) CLMS images and flow cytometry analysis of JAWSII dendritic cell uptake of various formulations after incubation for 15 min. Nile Red (NR) fluorescence is depicted in red. (n = 6; ns indicates no significance, *** p < 0.001 vs. blank group); (H) IL‐6, IL‐12p70, and CXCL5 levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated JAWSII dendritic cells after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (I) NO, IL‐6, and TNF‐α levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (J) Western blot analysis of CD206 and Arg‐1 levels from each group (n = 3; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001).

Article Snippet: Simulated gastric fluid (SGF) and simulated intestinal fluid (SIF) were purchased from Shanghai Yuanye Bio‐Technology Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China).

Techniques: In Vitro, Polymer, Zeta Potential Analyzer, Encapsulation, Flow Cytometry, Incubation, Fluorescence, Cell Culture, Western Blot